Model vs Mannequin — Showcasing Attires Online

TI Himu
2 min readMar 2, 2022

--

The profitability of your ecommerce site is dependent on the quality of your product photographs. Your customers should get the most out of the product by using your website.

This entails providing your clients with more fabulous detailed photographs from various perspectives and viewpoints. Only the product photographs should be enough for the client to choose from.

This often leads us to the query of whether to utilize a mannequin or a model in your goods photography. We’ll look at some benefits and drawbacks below that could assist you in making the best possible decision.

Imagery using ghost mannequin

The ghost mannequin technique is a popular retouching method for e-businesses to showcase apparel and accessories.

Pros

1. It is a budget-friendly method.

2. It avoids distraction.

3. Online customers can visualize the item and depict how it would appear on them.

4. The mannequin delivers the apparel item a human-like shape without the expense of a professional model.

Cons

1. Models can advertise a business’s elegance and identity in a way that mannequins cannot.

2. Ghost mannequins aren’t conducive to a successful branding method.

Imagery using a model

Using a model in your product photos is a terrific way to show off your company’s ideology.

Pros

1. Using a model can help your product become more approachable.

2. Apparel technics can be observed more clearly on a model.

3. When using a model, you can display multiple products at once.

4. The model could represent your company’s values.

Cons

1. A model can draw attention away from the good or service.

2. Hiring a model is costly.

3. A model might not appeal to your target audience.

The most crucial element of a product image is quality. However, You must professionally do this. In most circumstances, using a ghost mannequin instead of a model is the safer choice.

--

--

TI Himu
TI Himu

Written by TI Himu

Tech enthusiast | Design Master | Research Spider

No responses yet